The SMS Coach, Justin H Mueller

Maryland SMS Marketing and A2P Messaging Rules

A plain-language, source-linked guide to Maryland authorities relevant to SMS, MMS, telemarketing, privacy, consent, and do-not-call issues.

2source records
1express text-message coverage
1related authority

What the sources say

The Maryland source records on this page include 1 source with express text-message coverage. Other sources may apply only to particular activities or provide related context. Federal law, carrier policy, and sender-registration requirements may still apply alongside state law.

Authorities and official sources

Each entry explains what the source says, where its limits are, and what it does not establish.

State law · Current

Maryland Stop the Spam Calls Act amendments to the Commercial Law article

#

Not yet reviewed · No current substantive review date recorded

Existing claims, limitations, assessment and historical verification labels are preserved; their presence is not evidence of a current review.

How this authority relates to messaging

The recorded source expressly includes text messaging within a broader legal or regulatory framework.

What the source establishes

  • Maryland’s current statute expressly uses “telephone call, text message, or voicemail transmission” in the telephonic-solicitation framework and ties covered automated solicitations to prior express written consent.

Limits and important context

  • Broad consumer telemarketing, automated solicitation, and consent statute.
  • Prior express written consent; sender identification; time-of-day and DNC-style controls under the amended framework.
  • Statutory exemptions remain for certain nonprofit, informational, and relationship-based communications.
  • Private action and enforcement risk are material.
  • State enforcement and private-claim exposure remain material.
  • Current codified section.
  • This definitions section alone does not resolve every exemption or which call-specific technical duties apply identically to texts.

Consent standard stated in the source

  • prior express written consent

Exceptions or special treatment

  • Nonprofit communication: Statutory exemptions remain for certain nonprofit, informational, and relationship-based communications.
  • Informational communication: Statutory exemptions remain for certain nonprofit, informational, and relationship-based communications.
  • Relationship-based communication: Statutory exemptions remain for certain nonprofit, informational, and relationship-based communications.

Official and supporting sources

  1. § 14-4501(d)(2), prior express written consent
Source and review details
Jurisdiction
Maryland
Source type
State law
Recorded operative status
Current

State law · Current

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act

#

Not yet reviewed · No current substantive review date recorded

Existing claims, limitations, assessment and historical verification labels are preserved; their presence is not evidence of a current review.

How this authority relates to messaging

This source is relevant to the broader program, but the recorded text does not expressly establish general SMS or MMS coverage.

What the source establishes

  • Add Maryland to notice, rights, opt-out, profiling, processor, and assessment workflows now rather than waiting for a later privacy refresh.

Limits and important context

  • Maryland enacted a full controller/processor privacy law with consumer rights and Maryland Consumer Protection Act enforcement. Material because Maryland is now one of the stricter state privacy regimes for consumer-data use; messaging programs touching Maryland residents should not assume “standard state omnibus law” treatment. The surfaced official bill materials confirm the law, rights structure, and UDAP-style enforcement; implementation should still reference the chaptered text directly because Maryland diverges from lighter state models. Effective October 1, 2025. Strongest surfaced official source is the Maryland General Assembly bill page. Effective October 1, 2025, but does not apply to processing before April 1, 2026.

Official and supporting sources

  1. 2024 Md. Laws ch. 454
Source and review details
Jurisdiction
Maryland
Source type
State law
Recorded operative status
Current

Continue with the most useful next step

Move from a jurisdiction or authority layer to the sources and tools most likely to answer the next question.

Check this state in the A2P Authority Stack Preflight Use program details to identify the authority layers that may apply. Federal law The federal statutes and regulations that form the national legal baseline for U.S. A2P text messaging. FCC rules and orders FCC actions addressing consent revocation, opt-out handling, robotext blocking, and related operational controls. Carrier policy Carrier policies and public guidance concerning approved messaging paths, consent evidence, opt-out handling, filtering, and sender behavior. Sender registration 10DLC, short-code, toll-free, vetting, and monitoring requirements used to register or verify U.S. A2P senders. National Do Not Call The national registry and federal do-not-call framework relevant to covered U.S. telemarketing programs. Browse SMS marketing laws by state Return to the complete state and national authority index.

Get a program-specific review

Use an advisory review when the result depends on facts that a public authority index cannot resolve.

See the advisory review
© 2026 The SMS Coach, Justin H Mueller Privacy Policy Terms of Service Contact