The SMS Coach, Justin H Mueller

Minnesota SMS Marketing and A2P Messaging Rules

A plain-language, source-linked guide to Minnesota authorities relevant to SMS, MMS, telemarketing, privacy, consent, and do-not-call issues.

2source records
2related authority

What the sources say

The Minnesota source records on this page do not expressly establish a general SMS or MMS rule. They are included because related telemarketing, do-not-call, privacy, or consumer-protection requirements may still matter to a messaging program.

Authorities and official sources

Each entry explains what the source says, where its limits are, and what it does not establish.

State law · Current

Minn. Stat. Chapter 325M

#

Not yet reviewed · No current substantive review date recorded

Existing claims, limitations, assessment and historical verification labels are preserved; their presence is not evidence of a current review.

How this authority relates to messaging

This source is relevant to the broader program, but the recorded text does not expressly establish general SMS or MMS coverage.

What the source establishes

  • Minnesota imposes adjacent privacy/data-use controls.

Limits and important context

  • AG enforcement.
  • Current 2025 statutory compilation displayed by the Revisor.
  • It is not a text-sending, telemarketing-consent, or DNC statute.

Official and supporting sources

  1. §§ 325M.01–325M.09, ISP privacy
Source and review details
Jurisdiction
Minnesota
Source type
State law
Recorded operative status
Current

State law · Current

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act

#

Not yet reviewed · No current substantive review date recorded

Existing claims, limitations, assessment and historical verification labels are preserved; their presence is not evidence of a current review.

How this authority relates to messaging

This source is relevant to the broader program, but the recorded text does not expressly establish general SMS or MMS coverage.

What the source establishes

  • Rights, transparency, consent for sensitive data, controller/processor duties, and complaint/enforcement workflows should already be in production if Minnesota residents are in scope.

Limits and important context

  • Minnesota AG resources identify the law, explain consumer rights, and note that the AG’s temporary warning-letter mechanism ended in early 2026. Material for nationwide messaging programs because Minnesota is now live and no longer in its initial warning-letter grace period. The especially important current-status point is that the AG’s temporary warning program ended January 31, 2026. Effective July 31, 2025. Strongest surfaced official source is the Minnesota AG privacy-law guidance. Effective July 31, 2025; the warning-letter period ended January 31, 2026.

Facts that may change the result

  • Does the organization fall within the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

Official and supporting sources

  1. July 28, 2025 Press Release
  2. Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act
Source and review details
Jurisdiction
Minnesota
Source type
State law
Recorded operative status
Current

Continue with the most useful next step

Move from a jurisdiction or authority layer to the sources and tools most likely to answer the next question.

Get a program-specific review

Use an advisory review when the result depends on facts that a public authority index cannot resolve.

See the advisory review